| Can
the new plagiarism (technology supported) be beneficial to teaching
practices?
Benefits may be found in an attempt
to combat the new plagiarism. Because the new forms of plagiarism
may include copy and pasting information into a paper or purchasing
a paper online, teachers need to rethink the writing they assign.
Certain assignments, like those that require a regurgitation of
the facts lend themselves to plagiarism. The following sites offer
a unique opinion of plagiarism and how it may benefit educational
practices.
In Praise of Plagiarism
http://www.stthomasu.ca/~hunt/plagiary.htm
Prevent Plagiarism with an outcomes
approach http://www.eddept.wa.edu.au/centoff/cmis/eval/technology/usenet/pplagiarism.pdf
Top
Can you rely
on online services and software for detecting plagiarism?
Even though online services and
software for detecting plagiarism are helpful and convenient they
to can be problematic. The following sites describe some problems
that may occur with these resources.
Turnitin.com, a Pedagogic Placebo
for Plagiarism
http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip060501.htm
Top
Is plagiarism
cheating?
Not everyone agrees that plagiarism
is cheating. In fact it is an accepted practice for newspaper
writers to pick up pieces of a story from the AP and include it
in their article without reference. So why is it emphasized so
in academics?
In Praise of Plagiarism
http://www.stthomasu.ca/~hunt/plagiary.htm
The University of Tasmania conducted
an evaluation to determine the difference in plagiarism and cheating
to develop academic dishonesty policies and procedures. The following
site is a preliminary report published by the committee. The report
makes a distinction between plagiarism and cheating.
Academic Misconduct (Plagiarism)
- Preliminary Report
http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:etmDpDwIgjIC:www.admin.utas.edu.au
Top
But even if
it isn't plagiarizing isnt it still wrong?
Not everyone agrees with this point
of view. Here are some dissenting opinions about plagiarism and
copyright. The first was written by John Perry Barlow, lyricist
for the Grateful Dead, and cofounder and executive chair of the
Electronic Frontier Foundation.
The Economy of Ideas
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html
Against User Interface Copyright
http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Copyright/look-and-feel.html
Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis
http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/94jie.html
Intellectual Value
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.07/dyson.html
Copywrong
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.03/1.3_stallman.copyright.html
Who owns knowledge?
http://mondediplo.com/2000/01/14queau
Sold Out
http://www.wcl.american.edu/pub/faculty/boyle/sold_out.htm
The Right to Read: A Short Story
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Top
What is plagiarism?
The answer to this question may
seem simple. Plagiarism is most simply using another's work without
giving credit. Even though it seems simple enough there are always
differences of opinion as to whether a work was plagiarized. The
following site, Is it Plagiarism?,(http://www.doug-johnson.com/dougwri/isit.html)
details an incident that occurred in December 1999. A parent sent
a message to Doug Johnson about plagiarism. He posted the question
to LM_NET. He asked teachers how he might respond to the letter
he received from the parent. He posted the original letter and
all of the responses on this website. The of teacher responses
clearly shows that even something as simple as the definition
of plagiarism will not be interpreted the same way by any two
teachers.
Avoiding Plagiarism, retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 2, 2002, http://sja.ucdavis.edu/avoid.htm
Top
Why should
we be concerned about plagiarism?
You are cheating yourself when using
someone elses work.
It is a dishonest and illegal thing to do in using someone elses
work as your own and not giving the person credit for the work
that was used.
Top
How can plagiarism
be avoided?
- Students need to be educated
on what plagiarism is and they are not to copy word for word
anyone elses work unless that person is given credit for
their work. When a person copies works and know it is a wrong
doing this is called intentional plagiarism. Unintentional plagiarism
is when someone copies carelessly, is sloppy with note taking,
and copying and pasting on electronic sources.
- When citing a source, regardless
if you directly quote or paraphrase, use quotation marks and
give the author credit. Sometimes you may be in doubt, but when
you are, play it safe and give credit.
- Use your own words and ideas
- Learn how to correctly cite an
author and paraphrase
Plagiarism.org, retrieved
from World Wide Web August 2, 2002, http://www.plagiarism.org/faq.html
Top
If I submit
a paper for one class and then submit the same paper again for
another class, can I correctly be accused of plagiarism?
Not plagiarism, but certainly a lower academic standard. If you
do not properly reference yourself and the content extracted from
your previous paper, then you are recycling
Top
What are some
additional resources regarding the issues of Free Speech?
The Freedom Forum is a nonpartisan foundation dedicated to free
press, free speech and free spirit for all people. The foundation
focuses on three main priorities: the Newseum, First Amendment
freedoms and newsroom diversity. Note: The Freedom Forum has closed
its international offices and discontinued international programs.
The First Amendment Center consolidated its operations in Arlington
and Nashville
Freedom Forum
http://www.freedomforum.org/about/
Free Speech Movement Digital
Archives
http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/FSM/
Scholarly Publishing, Peer review and the Internet
http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_4/proberts/
This paper addresses one domain of academic activity where
I believe such a stance might be appropriate, namely, scholarly
publishing. A number of different forms of writing in cyberspace
are identified, and some of the arguments in favor of moving from
print-based publishing to electronic environments are assessed.
The paper reinforces the need for rigorous systems of peer review
in scholarly work, and considers possible futures for serials
in cyberspace.
Top
|
|
What is
the law regarding software piracy?
To make or download unauthorized copies of software is to break
the law, no matter how many copies are involved. Whether you are
casually making a few copies for friends, loaning disks, distributing
and/or downloading pirated software via the Internet, or buying
a single software program and then installing it on 100 of your
company's personal computers, you are committing a copyright infringement.
It doesn't matter if you are doing it to make money or not --
you are exposing yourself to severe civil and potentially even
criminal penalties. For example, those individuals using the Internet
to list, sell or distribute pirated or counterfeit software programs
through online auctions and "warez" sites may be criminally
prosecuted, even if they do not profit from the illegal activity.
Top
What are
the penalties for pirating software?
Infringement, and statutory damages can be as much as $150,000
for each program copied. In addition, the government can criminally
prosecute you for copyright infringement. If convicted, you can
be, fined up to $250,000, or sentenced to jail for up to five
years, or both. Apart from legal consequences, using copied or
counterfeit software
also means:
- Greater exposure to software
viruses, corrupt disks, or otherwise defective software
- Inadequate or no documentation.
No warranties
- Lack of technical product support
available to properly licensed users
- Ineligibility for software upgrades
offered to properly licensed users
Top
What are
your responsibilities as a software user?
You need to be responsible as a
software user:
- To purchase only legitimate
software products
- To install and use your software
in accordance with the license agreement
Top
What is
the economic impact of software piracy?
In the United States, 25 percent
of all business software is unlicensed. The Business Software
Alliance (BSA) estimates that in 2001 the industry lost more than
$1.8 billion in revenue in the United States alone due to software
theft. But software piracy's damaging economic impact is not just
confined to the software industry. In fact, software piracy has
an effect on the economic health of the nation as a whole. In
2000, the United States suffered a staggering 118,000 job losses,
$5.6 billion in lost wages and $1.6 billion in lost tax revenue
due to pirated software.
Top
What is the government's commitment
to legal software?
Not only is the U.S. government
continually striving to uphold and enforce intellectual property
rights, but it has also become a leader in software management
and legalization practices. In 1998, the federal government reinforced
its own commitment to the use of legal, licensed computer software
by requiring that all government agencies and
contractors use only legal software. Since then, numerous state
governments have begun to follow suit.
Top
How does
software piracy affect schools?
The widespread availability of computers and Internet connections
in schools has meant a tremendous advance in learning for America's
students. But it also provides an easy way for software piracy
to operate, especially if students and teachers aren't aware of
the laws that govern the use of software. Unless schools have
a clear, written policy about software use that is distributed
to every teacher and student, educators take the chance their
school will become a home to software piracy. For more information
checkout Reboot Your Attitude at http://www.bsa.org/nopiracy/reboot/
.
Top
|
References
and Resources
Academic Misconduct (Plagiarism)
- Preliminary Report, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August
2, 2002,
http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:etmDpDwIgjIC:www.admin.utas.edu.au
Against User Interface Copyright,
The League for Programming Freedom, retrieved from the
World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Copyright/look-and-feel.html
Aust exec defends Kazaa sleeper
software, John Borland,
Special to ZDNet, ZDNet, retrieved from the World Wide
Web, August 2, 2002,
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/communications/story/0,2000024993,20264393,00.htm
Avoiding Plagiarism, University
of California, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 2,
2002,
http://sja.ucdavis.edu/avoid.htm
Blocking Software FAQ from Peacefire,
retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.peacefire.org/info/blocking-software-faq.html
Business Software Alliance,
retrieved from World Wide Web, August 1, 2002, http://www.bsa.org/usa/freetools/consumers/swandlaw_c.phtml
Conservatives and Intellectual
Property, by James Boyle, text of a speech to the National
Federalist Society Annual Meeting in Washington DC, published
in Engage Volume 1, April 2000 p.83
http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/Federalist.htm
Controversy: Should Public Policy
Support Open-Source Software?,
The American Prospect Online, retrieved from the World
Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.prospect.org/controversy/open_source/
Copywrong, Richard
Stallman, Wired, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 1,
2002,
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.03/1.3_stallman.copyright.html
The Cookie Controversy: Anti-Cookie
Software, Lori Eichelberger
M.L.I.S., Cookie Central, retrieved from the World Wide
Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.cookiecentral.com/ccstory/cc5.htm
Disclosure of Personal Identification
Information of Students available online at the Responsible
Netizen Institute, retrieved from the World Wide Web,
July 20, 2002,
http://responsiblenetizen.org/cipa/111.html
The Economy of Ideas, John
Perry Barlow, Wired, retrieved from the World Wide Web,
August 2, 2002,
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html
Ensuring Student Privacy On The
Internet by Dr. Nancy Willard available online at Education
World, retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 15, 2002,
http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech120.shtml
Family Education Rights and Privacy
Act (FERPA) Regulations, retrieved from the World Wide Web,
July 8, 2002,
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OM/fpco/ferparegs.html
First Amendment, retrieved from the World Wide Web, July
7, 2002,
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/
Free Speech Movement Digital
Archives, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 2, 2002,
http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/FSM/
Freedom Forum, retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 2, 2002,
http://www.freedomforum.org/about/
The GIF Controversy: A Software
Developer's Perspective, Last revision February 2, 2002.
Original text published January 27, 1995. © 1995-2002 of
the Author. Web shortcut
to this page: lzw.info.
Parts are quoted with permission from CompuServe Information Service.
Parts are excerpted from the PNG specification., retrieved
from World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://cloanto.com/users/mcb/19950127giflzw.html
Illinois School Code (105 ILCS
5/10-20.20) Sec. 10-20.20. Protection from suit.) available
online at http://www.legis.state.il.us/ilcs/ch105/ch105act5articles/ch105act5Sub17.htm
In Praise of Plagiarism,
Ross Hunt, revised May/June 2002, retrieved from the World Wide
Web, August 2, 2002,
http://www.stthomasu.ca/~hunt/plagiary.htm
Intellectual Property: Federal
Policies Must Balance User and Producer Rights,
Association of American Universities, March 2002, retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002, http://www.aau.edu/intellect/IntlPropTP.html
Is information property?(Legally
Speaking), by Pamela Samuelson, Communications of the ACM
March 1991 v34 n3 p15(4) COPYRIGHT Association for Computing
Machinery 1991. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://eserver.org/internet/Is-Information-Property.txt
Is it Plagiarism?, Comments
gathered from LM_Net in response to a parent question, hit posted
by Doug Johnson. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 2,
2002,
http://www.doug-johnson.com/dougwri/isit.html
Intellectual Value, Esther
Dyson, Wired, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August
1, 2002,
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.07/dyson.html
Legal Issues & Education
Technology: A School Leaders Guide, 1999, National School
Boards Association, A Technology Leadership Network Special Report
developed by the National School Boards Association's Council
of School Attorneys and ITTE: Education Technology Programs
Linking, Copyright Website,
retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.benedict.com/digital/webIssues/webLinking.asp
Plagiarism.org, Frequently
Asked Questions, retrieved from World Wide Web August 2, 2002,
http://www.plagiarism.org/faq.html
Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis,
Brian Martin, Published in Journal of Information Ethics, Vol.
3, No. 2, Fall 1994, pp. 36-47, with minor editorial changes.
Retrieved from the World Wide Web August 1, 2002,
http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/94jie.html
Policy Paradigms of Intellectual
Property, by Oliver Roup, Paper for MIT 6.805/STS085: Ethics
and Law on the Electronic Frontier, Fall 1995, retrieved from
the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/6095/student-papers/fall95-papers/roup-IP.html
Prevent Plagiarism With An Outcomes
Approach, retrieved from
the World Wide Web, August 2, 2002,
http://www.eddept.wa.edu.au/centoff/cmis/eval/technology/usenet/pplagiarism.pdf
Reboot Your Attitude, Business
Software Alliance, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 2,
2002,
http://www.bsa.org/nopiracy/reboot/
The Right to Read: A Short Story,
Richard Stallman, This article appeared in the February 1997 issue
of Communications of the ACM (Volume 40, Number 2). Retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Scholarly Publishing, Peer review
and the Internet, Peter Roberts, First Monday, retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 2, 2002,
http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_4/proberts/
Sold Out, James Boyle, Originally
published in the New York Times, March 31, 1996. Retrieved
from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.wcl.american.edu/pub/faculty/boyle/sold_out.htm
TopDog software controversy,
Pandia Search World News Archive, retrieved from the World
Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.pandia.com/sw-2002/19-topdog.html
Turnitin.com, a Pedagogic Placebo
for Plagiarism, Bedford/St.
Martin's Tech Notes, retrieved
from the World Wide Web, July 12, 2002,
http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip060501.htm
Webpage Design Issues, Copyright
Website, retrieved from the World Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://www.benedict.com/digital/webIssues/webDesign.asp
Who owns knowledge?, Philippe
Queau, Le Monde diplomatique, retrieved from the World
Wide Web, August 1, 2002,
http://mondediplo.com/2000/01/14queau
Top
|