Addendum to An Educators' Guide to Credibility and Web Evaluation

Home Page
Why Evaluate?
Methods of Evaluation
Teaching Evaluation
Conclusion
References

Other White Paper Addendums:

Accessibilty
Commercialism
Computer Crime
Free Speech
Intellectual Property
Privacy

 

 

Level 2 (Grades 9-12)

2. Evaluation Techniques

OBJECTIVES

Upon completion of this lesson, the students will be able to:

*

Recognize the indicators that determine a Web site’s credibility.

*

Use critical thinking skills to determine the credibility of different Web sites.

*

Make judgments as to which sites could be used as acceptable resource material for the research paper.

MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT

*

Computer lab with Internet access.

*

LCD projector and screen or Smart Board.

*

The Web article entitled “Evaluating Internet Resources” http://library.albany.edu/internet/evaluate.html

TIME

*

2 class periods or 96-100 minutes of instruction.

PROCESS

DAY 1 – Learning the Different Evaluation Techniques

*

Read and discuss the article entitled “Evaluating Internet Resources” http://library.albany.edu/internet/evaluate.html .

*

Present and discuss the Power Point Presentation entitled “Web Resource Evaluation Techniques”.  http://www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webeval/eval1198/sld001.htm

HOMEWORK

*

The students should find a school-appropriate Web site (one they may be able to use for their research paper).  Record the URL (Web address) and be prepared to evaluate it during tomorrow’s class.

*

For those without access to an off-campus compute, a printed copy on homepage found during class should be used.

 

DAY 2 – Teacher Modeling of Evaluation Techniques

*

Lecture about and model how to use the following indicators to evaluate a Web site's credibility.  Use the corresponding Web site's to illustrate each indicator.

-          Author Credibility - http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/index.html Is the name of the author present?  Is there a way to contact the author? (Email, phone number, etc.)  Are the author’s credentials listed?

-         Purpose (Content) - http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/index.html What is the site trying to do?  Why was the site created? Was the site created to sell a product or promote a particular idea?  Was the site created solely for the purpose of entertainment?

-         Domain - .gov - U.S. government site - http://www.whitehouse.gov ; .edu – accredited or reputable college or university -http://www.uiuc.edu or http://www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webeval/eval1198/ ; .com – a commercial site that is created for a profit or to make money - http://www.eastbay.com ; .org – a non-for-profit organization - http://www.petfinder.org ; .net – a network infrastructure (often used for a server that hosts Web sites for others – http://www.rr1.net

-         Currency - http://www.usatoday.com/  Has the site been updated recently?  Does it contain current information? Where is the date of the document usually placed? (bottom of page)

-         Overall Design - http://online.wsj.com/public/us or http://www.acs.ucalgary.ca/%7Edkbrown/  Does the site have any errors (spelling, grammatical, and/or profanity?) Is the information easy to find? Where is the date of the document usually placed? (bottom of page) Is the material easy to read? Are the background and text colors easy on the eyes? Are the graphics appropriate and appealing or inappropriate and annoying? Are flashing icons or advertisements present?

HOMEWORK

*

The students should examine the Web site they found on DAY 1 (Evaluation Techniques).

*

Using the same Web site, the students should be prepared to complete an evaluation checklist to determine the site’s credibility.

*

The students should be able to report their findings.

© 2002 

Developed by Anne Catey, Curriculum Technology Education Reform, University of Illinois. Any questions or comments should be directed to the author at acatey@hotmail.com

Last updated on August 2, 2002.