Home    Schedule    Readings    Instructor



Readings
(all available online)

R1. Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J.C., (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J.L. Miller and P.D. Eimas (Eds.) Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd edition. Vol. 11: Speech, Language, and Communication. NY: Academic Press. Pp. 217-262. http://www.nbu.bg/cogs/events/2008/tanenhaustrueswell.pdf

R2. Elman, J. (2004) An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7):301-306. http://crl.ucsd.edu/~elman/Papers/elman_tics_opinion_2004.pdf

R3. Barsalou, L.W., Simmons, W.K., Barbey, A., &Wilson, C.D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91. http://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/barsalou/papers/Barsalou_et_al_TICS_2003_grounding_knowledge.pdf

R4. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Glenberg, A. M.; Robertson, D. A.; Journal of Memory & Language, Vol 43(3), Oct 2000. pp. 379-401. http://psych.wisc.edu/glenberg/Papers/Symbol%20grounding.pdf

R5. Adele E. Goldberg. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science. http://www.princeton.edu/~adele/Princeton_Construction_Site/Publications_fil es/Trends%20in%20CogSciTrCgSci.03.pdf

R6. Kaschak, Michael P. and Arthur M. Glenberg 2000,Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language 43: 508-529. http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~kaschaklab/ConstructingMeaning.pdf

R7. Bergen, Benjamin and Kathryn Wheeler (2010).Grammatical Aspect and Mental Simulation. Brain & Language 112:150-158. http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~bkbergen/papers/bergenwheelerBL.pdf

R8. Sedivy, J. C., M. K. Tanenhaus, G. C. Chambers, and G. N. Carlson. "Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation." Cognition 71 (1999): 109-147. http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/mtan/publications/1999Sedivy_etal.pdf

R9. Tanenhaus at al. (1996) http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P96/P96-1007.pdf

R10. Kamide, Yuki, Gerry Altmann, and Sarah L. Haywood. 2003. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 133-156. http://web.me.com/silvia_gennari/page1/assets/kamide_et_al03.pdfplus Corrigendum: http://homepage.mac.com/gerry_altmann/research/papers/files/erratum.pdf

R10. McRae, K., Hare, M., Elman, J.L., & Ferretti, T. (2006). A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory and Cognition, 33,1174-1184.http://crl.ucsd.edu/~elman/Papers/McRae_Hare_Elman_Ferretti-MemCog.pdf

R11. Kutas, M. and Schmitt, B.M. Language in microvolts, In: Banich, M.T. and Mack, M. (Ed). Mind, brain, and language: Multidisciplinary perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: NJ, 2003, pp.171-209. http://kutaslab.ucsd.edu/people/kutas/pdfs/2003.MBL.171.pdf

R12. Kaana, E.and Swaabb, T. 2002. The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6. http://faculty.washington.edu/losterho/kaan_and_swaab.pdf

R13. Altmann, G.T.M. (1998). Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 146-151. http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/courses/FLST/2007/slides/tics-altmann.pdf

R14. Gordon, P.C., R. Hendrick, and W. H. Levine."Memory-load interference in syntactic processing." Psychological Science 13 (2002): 425-430. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063874

R15. Gibson, E., and N. Pearlmutter. "Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing." Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 (2000):231-240. http://tedlab.mit.edu/tedlab_website/researchpapers/Gibson%20&%20Pearlmutter%202000%20JPR.pdf

R16. Tanenhaus, M., M. Spivey-Knowlton, K. Eberhard, and J. Sedivy. "Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension." Science 268 (1995): 1632-1634. http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/mtan/publications/1995Tanenhaus_Sci.pdf

R17. Michael J. Spivey, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Kathleen M. Eberhard and Julie C. Sedivy. 2002. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 45:4, 447-481. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.131.8166&rep=rep1&type=pdf

R18. Wolf, F., E. Gibson, and Desmet. "Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution." Language and Cognitive Processes 19 (2004): 665-675. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.114.5294&rep=rep1&type=pdf

R19. Wu, Y.C. & Coulson, S. (2007). How iconic gestures enhance communication: An ERP study. Brain & Language 101:234-245. http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/Papers/wu-coulson07b.pdf

R20. Frazier, L., Carlson, K., and Clifton, C. Jr.. 2006. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages244-249. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.140.2678&rep=rep1&type=pdf

R21. Frisson, S. & Pickering, M. J. (1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25:1366–83. http://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/pdf/frisson-pickering-jeplmc-99.pdf

R22. Glucksberg, S. (2003). The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 92-96. http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/courses/LAM5430/More5430e-reserves/PSYCHOLING_METAPHOR.pdf

R23. Gibbs, R. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21, 434-458. .http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x/abstract

R24. Bowdle, B. Gentner, D. 2005. Career of metaphor. Psychological Review Vol. 112(1): 193-216. http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/newpdfpapers/BowdleGentner05.pdf

R25. Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1389-1400. http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/tmatlock/papers/memcog-final.pdf

R26. Richardson, D. C., & Matlock, T. (2006). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition. http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/tmatlock/papers/RichardsonMatlockInPress.pdf

R27. Sanford, A.J. and Sturt, P. (2002) Depth of Processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (9). pp. 382-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7