AUP Addendum
Acceptable use policies are documents usually drafted by a school's administrator or committee of faculty, administrators and possibly parents.  AUPs are designed to place responsible use of technology and the internet with the student.  These documents are used as contracts between the schools and the students which are signed by both parties and often times parents are asked to sign.  Many schools now have AUPs because of the inadequacy of filters that are intended to block all objectionable material.  There are many who feel that AUPs are a form of censorship.  Students may feel they are being censored from information, communication and the ability to publish their works in original form.  Corporations and entrepreneurs may feel they are being censored from access to the student segment of society.  School districts don't always have the luxury of dealing with the law alone.  They must answer to the public and try to look out for the best interests of the children they are trying to educate.

The original white paper demonstrates the arguments both for and against the use of AUPs in schools and the workplace.  Below are updates to some of those arguments along with helpful hints to writing AUPs if this is something a district decides to do. 

 

Child Online Protection Act
The COPA itself can be found at  http://www.epic.org/free_speech/censorship/copa.html

Janet Reno ordered a restraining order on this act on Nov 19, 1998 which prevented its enforcement for 10 days.  http://www.epic.org/free_speech/copa/tro.html

On May 13, 2002 the Supreme Court issued a decision barring enforcement of the COPA.      www.epic.org/free_speech/copa/

This is a joint statement made by the Internet Fee Expression Alliance
http://www.ifea.net/joint_statement_9_98.html

It's understandable that congress tried to pass a law that answers to its constituencies' concerns about the harmful material to children on the internet.  This demonstrates the importance of the Constitution and how the three branches of government keep each other in check.

 

Communications Decency Act
The actual act passed by congress in Feb. of 1996 can be found here: http://www.epic.org/CDA/cda.html

Information on what led to the act being declared unconstitutional.  http://www.epic.org/cda/

Additional Resources:  http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/week/cda-index.html

 

Internet Access in the Workplace
I found that the additional resources link on the original white paper page does not work. The following one is a quick write up on the decision to uphold the Virginia Law that prohibits employees of Virginia from looking at sexually explicit material while at work..
http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=12771

 

AUPs - Students/Parents
Don't Sign -- To this argument it might be noted that filters do not work to the degree they are needed and therefore should not be relied on alone.

Sign --  To the argument that responsibility should lie with the students it might be worthy to note an age.  I would be hard pressed to hold a first or second grader responsible for accidentally coming across an objectionable web site.

 

AUPs - Employees/Staff
This issue is somewhat related to Internet Access in the Workplace and could be decided by law.

Teachers are role models for students whether they like it or not and I think most understand this.  As a result this is an issue which could be negotiated into a teacher/staff contract.  This would eliminate the need for a second agreement between the employees and their board of education.

 

AUPs - Guest/Community
School computers are in the public domain which would limit a persons privacy.

A tax paying adult might feel that it is their right to use, but these computers could not be restricted to adult use.  It would be tough to accommodate the adult's rights without violating those of the students.

 

AUPs - Creating and Applying
Who writes the document?
Who enforces the document?
Language
Issues that should be addressed
Violations and Additional Resources

Return to Free Speech and Censorship Addendum