Teaching Teleapprenticeships: An Innovative Model for Technology Integration in Teacher Education



Catherine O. Thurston
Evangeline D. Secaras
James A. Levin
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Thurston, C. O., Secaras, E., & Levin, J. A. (1996). Teaching Teleapprenticeships: An innovative model for technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(5), [Online]. Also reprinted in Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(4), 385-391.


Abstract
A critical need exists for teachers to be trained to skillfully integrate technology into their instruction. An innovative program at the College of Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Teaching Teleapprenticeships, is in its fourth year of integrating technology into the preservice experience of undergraduate education majors. One group targeted by the TTa researchers has been the Year-Long Project, YLP, involving elementary education majors. Data were collected on the impact of this program on the YLP through surveys, interviews, video, digital images, and a number of non-traditional measures. Results show that technology has become more than an add-on, more than just part of the curriculum they are studying. It is an integral part of the students' personal as well as professional lives. (Keywords: technology, teacher education, integration, teleapprenticeships.)



Teaching Teleapprenticeships: An Innovative Model for Technology Integration in Teacher Education


   According to a recent report from the U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (1995), Technology and Teachers: Making the Connection, in the rush to get technology into the schools, teachers are often overlooked. "In the process of equipping new students to learn with technology, a valuable - perhaps the most valuable - part of the education equation has been virtually overlooked: the teachers.... Despite over a decade of investment in educational hardware and software, relatively few of the nation's 2.8 million teachers use technology in their teaching." (OTA, 1995, foreword-iii)

   Today, while many would agree that effective uses of technology for new teachers is a critical component in their training, it is not central to the teacher preparation experience in many teacher preparation institutions nation-wide. "Most new teachers graduate from teacher preparation institutions with limited knowledge of the ways technology can be used in their professional practice" (OTA, 1995, p. 165). A powerful impetus can be progressively built up in the nation's schools if the newest teachers to enter the work force can be trained to skillfully integrate technology into their teaching.

   At the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, an innovative model for technology integration in teacher training, Teaching Teleapprenticeships (TTa), has evolved over the past four years. TTa, funded by the National Science Foundation with additional support from Apple Computer and the Microsoft Corporation, has involved College of Education faculty, student teachers, supervisors, research assistants and undergraduates in a new approach to technology integration in the teacher education curriculum. The TTa approach infuses technology throughout the teacher preparation experience and takes advantage of interdisciplinary faculty teaming. This article explores the successes of the TTa model as indicated by a three-year study of the students' experiences in the Year-Long Project (YLP), a program designed to facilitate the transition from student to elementary education teacher. For these students, technology has become more than an add-on, more than just part of the curriculum they are studying. It has become an integral part of their personal as well as their professional lives as beginning teachers.

Teaching Teleapprenticeships

   Teaching Teleapprenticeships (Levin, Waugh, Clift, and Brown, 1994) is a new teacher education model that extends the traditional face-to-face apprenticeships currently used in student teaching settings by using electronic networks to provide a more powerful context for learning in preservice and inservice education courses. Through network interactions and resource sharing, this model brings together the university coordinators, student teacher supervisors, school district master teachers, instructors, the preservice teachers, and the students being taught by the student teachers.

   PowerBooks equipped with 14.4K bps internal modems, communications software such as Eudora and Netscape, and Microsoft Works have been loaned to groups of student teachers, faculty and university supervisors as a means to communicate and exchange teaching ideas and projects as part of the TTa research. The project staff, including faculty from several departments in the College of Education and a number of research assistants, have worked cooperatively with college preservice faculty to integrate technology through a number of the preservice courses. A number of sections of the undergraduate classes have been involved in TTa, including the Introduction to Biology class (Levin, Levin & Boehmer, 1994), the Year-Long Project (for elementary education students), math methods, science methods, English methods, and others. Rather than teach education majors one specific undergraduate course in technology, the model has been to infuse technology throughout a number of pre-service classes, using technology both as a means of instruction and as a tool for teaching.

Year-Long Project (YLP)


   The undergraduate elementary education students participating in the Year-Long Project (YLP) have been involved in the TTa project for the past three years. This year, 49 students in the YLP share 25 PowerBooks in teams of two. The course instructor, a faculty member in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, cooperatively plans the technology strand with the TTa project staff. This team provides instruction on technology, conducts hands-on workshops , documents the class's work with the technology, and staffs an office for full-time technical assistance.

   Much of the students' work is assigned and completed electronically. The students and the faculty participate in a number of mail reflector lists on the College of Education's Learning Resource Server (LRS), a server designed to house and support instructional materials (http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/). All of the students are expected to use technology throughout the YLP experience; they are encouraged to use their PowerBooks in their assigned schools as well.

   Technology instruction includes use of email using Eudora, use of the World Wide Web, integration of multimedia in the curriculum, use of such teaching tools as a database and a spreadsheet, use of "wizards" to create presentations and newsletters, use of digitization tools such as scanners and digital cameras, use of presentation hardware such as an LCD panel and presenter box, and creation of personal homepages on the Web (http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ylp95-96/ )or http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ylp94-95/).

   Students are required to develop a mini unit for their classes. They must use Internet resources in creating this unit. The best units from the 1994-1995 YLP class are posted on the Web (http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/YLP94-95/mini-units/), and the class of 1995-96 has been interested in following the number of "hits" the preceding year's class has been getting on the Web. For example, in the month of November, 1995, the mini units received 1301 accesses from around the world as well as the United States. Seven countries outside of the United States were represented, at least fifteen states within the US, and interestingly, less than 10% came internally from the University of Illinois.

   Students have been enthusiastic about this new approach to technology. Most are reluctant to part with their PowerBooks when they leave the program. Analysis of email exchanges and of access to the LRS as well as interviews, video, digitized images, biannual survey data, and some additional non-traditional measures have helped TTa researchers document the success of their model by tracking the integration of technology into the professional and private lives of the YLP students.

Indicators of Integration


   TTa researchers have been collecting responses to student surveys at the end of each semester. The students have answered questions concerning problems they've had, successes they've experienced, and other concerns as well as the extent to which they have used the Web and email. (http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ylp95-96/) For the 1995 fall semester, 47 of the 49 students in the YLP responded to the survey. Of these 47, 85% indicated they found email either "helpful" or "very helpful" in the completion of class work and assignments; and 54% reported finding the Web either "helpful" or "very helpful" in completing course work.

   At the end of the spring semester, May 1995, the 48 members of the YLP program for 1994-95 were surveyed as they were preparing to graduate and look for their first teaching positions. One question asked how many were planning to use technology in their teaching the next year. Eighty-five percent responded positively. Of all of the uses of technology listed, most indicated that they were likely to use Internet tools; the second preference was that they hoped to use multimedia applications. Additionally, they responded that they would like to use tools such as a grade book and a database to facilitate their teaching.

   The TTa researchers use the semester survey data to guide adaptations and variations in the course structure from one year to the next. Based on the '94-'95 responses, for example, the TTa group pre-assessed the '95-'96 YLP students as to their incoming technology skills and made some attempt at grouping them according to computer skill level. This was done so that students with computer expertise could learn more advanced network applications while novice users were introduced to the Internet at a pace comfortable for them. In addition, based on student surveys, more hands-on opportunities were incorporated into the course structure. The 1994 surveys queried students about their use of Gopher. By the 1995 surveys, the course had eliminated instruction in Gopher and jumped to questions about the students' use of the Web.

   An interesting indicator of the extent to which technology was assimilated into the thinking of the student teachers was reflected in their sketches of the ideal classroom. Traditionally in the student teaching curriculum, a standard assignment has been for the students in elementary education to draw a floor plan of the ideal classroom. The YLP faculty made this assignment as usual in the fall of '94, with no mention of technology. Surprisingly, technology appeared to have permeated the consciousness of 37 out of the 45 students. With no prompting, these students included classroom computers in various configurations in their ideal classrooms. That is compared to 4 of the 45 students from the previous year, with the same assignment, who had included one or more computers in their classroom.

   A more powerful measure of the impact of the technology was the evidence that the student teachers used email and their group mail reflector not only to complete course work, find Internet resources for their mini units, and correspond with their instructors, but also to plan TGIF parties, design a class T-shirt, and put out requests for extra graduation tickets.

   An early draft of Standards for English Language Arts published by the National Standards for English and the International Reading Association states that "literacy is profoundly social. Literacy develops in response to students' needs to participate in larger and larger language communities, both at home and in the school. From infancy through adulthood, language and literacy are best learned in social relationships with others and through purposeful and challenging engagements in meaningful activity." Technological literacy is also a profoundly social experience, observable in group interactions, in forging new connections beyond walls, and in the cooperative learning that comes from sharing resources.

   With the demand for PowerBooks outstripping the number of available machines, necessity forced sharing of PowerBooks in several of the larger sections of the courses. Although admittedly inconvenient, it may have had some hidden benefits, resulting from forced sharing and teamwork. A recent report (West, 1995) based on the research done in ACOT classrooms (Apple Classroom of Tomorrow ) suggests that "less may be more." The study suggests that students working in clusters or small groups with computers may actually benefit from the group work, and that rather than being an isolating experience, the computer work is conducive to small group cooperative efforts.

   Another non-traditional indicator of the level of integration of technology into the social lives of the student teachers came as they planned their end of the year party. The students devised a skit, accompanied by a giant story book, "Adventures in YLP Land," in which various students wrote adventure stories. In one, a character became trapped in an endless listserve, able to escape only when he learned to click his heels three times while chanting "unsubscribe! unsubscribe! unsubscribe!"

   A final graphic measure of the students' integration of technology is documented with video from their actual student teaching experiences. Students were not required to take PowerBooks to schools with them, nor was there a technology requirement in 1994 or 1995 for their actual student teaching. Nevertheless, a number of them chose to integrate technology into their lessons. Video footage from some of these classrooms documents their use of the technology in their teaching experience.

   The continuous infusion of technology as a strand in the pre-service program has already provided some dramatic results. As reported by the Office of Technology Assessment, "Telling students what is possible is not enough, they must see technology used by their instructors, observe the use of technological tools in their classrooms, and practice teaching with technology themselves if they are to use these tools effectively in their own teaching" (OTA, 1995, p. 184).

Lessons Learned


   The Teaching Teleapprenticeships model is constantly evolving as researchers and faculty learn from their efforts and refine the program from one year to the next. As the project scales up to include more students, it is important to keep in mind some of the lessons learned thus far. Following are a few observations:
  1. Students benefit from sharing and working in small groups or in teams of two as they learn new technologies. A mathematics instructor commented "The 101/219 students merely see the potential and are 'going ape' over the possibilities. It is the best thing we have tried. I see that if they can learn about math and math teaching in a new and different way, they are more apt to teach differently themselves."
  2. A key element in the success of this effort has been the strong technical support available to the student teachers. A walk-in office, staffed by research assistants all day, has been able to provide immediate help for most technical problems. As a result, when the student teachers in the YLP group were surveyed in December, 1995, and asked "What were the biggest problems you had using technology in the YLP this semester?" the response was revealing. A majority wrote "none," did not answer, or wrote "n/a." Of the 22 who did indicate problems, purely technical problems were reported by about five students, such as "PowerBook problems," or "battery problems." Many complained of access-related problems such as having to share PowerBooks, not having enough live phone lines the classroom, or not having enough printers. These could be viewed as successes, as they indicate a desire on the part of the students to increase their use of the technology. A third group reported problems with instruction-related items, such as wanting more detailed documentation.
  3. As reported in surveys and interviews, as much hands-on experience as possible with technology, as opposed to lecture/demonstration, is critical. Every semester the faculty has seen a need to increase the hands-on opportunities for the students. Even with increased lab time in the fall semester of 1995, the evaluations still had a number of responses to "What suggestions would you make for changes for next year?" indicating a desire for more lab time. These responses included "more access to computer room," "more on computer with modem hookups," or "more time hooked up."
  4. Real classroom teachers who use technology effectively are the best role models as instructional leaders. Whenever possible, it is important to involve them in the technology strand of teacher education, bringing them in to give demonstrations of their own technology uses or involving them through network interactions with undergraduate education students.
  5. The contextualization of technology is critical. If student teachers use the Web to find resources for units they are creating, or connect with classrooms across the world for classroom curriculum projects, or learn to create digitized images of themselves and their students for their own home pages, the technology becomes a means to an end rather than an end unto itself, and thus, much more effective.

   As the OTA report (1995) concludes, "There are approximately 1300 institutions of higher education preparing future teachers in this country. In the 1990-91 school year, nearly 100,000 student teachers graduated with a bachelors' degree in teacher education in the United States. In the next decade, the nation's schools will need to hire about 2 million teachers." Ideally, these new teachers should be able to use a range of technological tools to provide effective instruction and help their student teachers become comfortable with and knowledgeable about technology. The most direct and cost effective way to educate teachers about technology is through the preservice education they receive in colleges of education or other institutions.

   As colleges of education move into this area of technology training, it becomes increasingly important to document the success and failures, publicize recommendations for future action, and raise the general awareness of the critical need we face of providing effective instruction for technology integration for these next two million teachers.

References

Conte, C., Communications Development Incorporated of Washington DC, & Kopp, K., (1995). The learning connection: Will the information highway transform schools and prepare students for the twenty-first century? Benton Foundation Communications Policy Project [On-line].

Levin, J. A., Riel, M., Miyake, N., & Cohen, M. (1987). Education on the electronic frontier: Teleapprentices in globally distributed educational contexts. Educational Psychology, 12, 254-260.

Levin, S., Levin, J., & Boehmer, R. (1994, April). Teaching Teleapprenticeships in a freshman biology course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Levin, J., Waugh, M., Brown, D., & Clift, R. (1994). Teaching Teleapprenticeships: A new organizational framework for improving teacher education using electronic networks.Journal of Machine-Mediated Learning, 4 (2 & 3), 149-161.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

West, P. (1995). With computers, Apple project finds less may be more. Education Week, 11, 6-8.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. RED-9253423. The Government has certain rights in this material. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

The authors would like to acknowledge their appreciation for the support from the following:
National Science Foundation
Apple Computer
Microsoft Corporation
Karl Koenke
Michael Waugh
YLP staff and students


Contributors

Dr. Catherine Thurston is Project Director of the Teaching Teleapprenticeships Project, College of Education at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She has been involved with a series of educational technology initiatives at the university for the past 8 years. She is particularly interested in issues of staff development and technology use in teacher training. (Address: Office of Teleapprenticeships, 32 Education Building, UIUC, 1310 S. Sixth St., Champaign IL 61820. Email: cthursto@uiuc.edu)

Evangeline Secaras is a Doctoral Candidate at the University of Illinois, College of Education in the Department of Educational Psychology. Her specialization is in the use of multimedia in the K-12 classroom. Her research interests include how the use of multimedia affects the way teachers teach and the way students learn and what impact this would have on visual literacy in the 21st Century. (Address: Office of Teleapprenticeships, 32 Education Building, UIUC, 1310 S. Sixth St., Champaign IL 61820. Email: esecaras@uiuc.edu)

Dr. James Levin is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He says of himself, "For many years I have been exploring ways in which technology can be used to improve education. I am especially excited by the ways in which new communication technologies fundamentally change the relationship between education and the rest of society." (Address: Office of Teleapprenticeships, 32 Education Building, UIUC, 1310 S. Sixth St., Champaign IL 61820. Email: j-levin@uiuc.edu)