NSC-68 and Post-War Consensus
I Another Era of Good Feelings
Election of Eisenhower
Dems also offered Eisenhower their nomination
Check out the map
Retreat of Republicans from intense hostility to New Deal Legislation
No calls for repeal OASSI, social security, FHA, Fannie Mae
And more domestic consensus: GI Bill; Urban renewal
Bipartisan agreement on Civil Rights
Troops to little Rock
Bipartisan support for cr legislation under JFK, LBJ
Cold War Civil Rights
The architects of NSC69 put together “a policy that provided solutions to a number of immediate and pressing problems” And they got lucky – the Korean War made their case more plausible, and the successful soviet atomic reaction made it more pressing.
II Immediate problems
Fragile support for Marshall Plan
By the 1947 it was clear that without a major American
initiative the nightmare of world recession would become a reality. The Marshall Plan was an attack on the
obstacles to European participation in the world economy. It financed European
imports form the
Fear of recession
Secy of State Dean Acheson: “We cannot go through another ten years like the ten years at the end of the twenties and the beginning of the Thirties”
And NSC 68: There are grounds for predicting that the US and other free nations will within a period of a few years at most experience a decline in economic activity of serious proportions unless a more positive governmental programs are developed
Balance of payments
Acheson again: we don’t a problem of production; the
III Post-war Goals
“to develop a healthy international community”
-a stable international monetary order with a high level of openness to market forces
- this political as well as
economic. Depression in
“containing the
atomic test; Korean war
this government” the American people, and all free peoples” must recognize that “the cold war is in fact a real war in which the survival of the free world is at stake”
alphabet soup nato, seato, etc for containment
IV Rearmament as solution
In practice, a massive rearmament effort
that tripled us military spending, while also rearming other members of the
Allows us to finance European purchase of US arms.
Stationing troops in
Some object that nsc 68 ‘vastly exaggerates soviet strength’.
Builds on foreign policy consensus
National Defense Student Loans. Book Jackets
Distributive policy with a difference
Unlike the antebellum roads and canals, creates a continuing appetite for more of the same.
V Changes since
Decline and collapse of the soviet threat
Rise of the European union (we were
also protecting
Block’s conclusion gives us a warning with incredible foresight -- recall, this written in 1979 – in the area where the Soviet threat is perceived to be most serious – the Persian Gulf -- the danger arises not from the great strength of the Soviet army, but from the weakness of the feudal regimes with which the US is allied. George Kennan’s observation, Block said, is as true now as it was in 1950: “communism” [must] be viewed as a crisis of our own civilization, and the principal antidote [lies] in overcoming the weaknesses of our own institutions.”